[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46942496.2050205@didntduck.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:30:14 -0400
From: Brian Gerst <bgerst@...ntduck.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [x86 setup 13/33] Header file to produce 16-bit code with gcc
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 01:42:48PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>>> Well at least with -fno-toplevel-reorder it is guaranteed
>>> to work (not the same thing as "is working", heh, but fairly
>>> close).
>>>
>>> It seems to me GCC should grow an option to insert .code16gcc
>>> by itself (-m16 perhaps?) Or GAS could get a flag to include
>>> a file as a prelude before the main thing. Neither will help
>>> Linux right now of course.
>> -m16 is the right thing, and it also provides a proper hook for
>> eventually having a real 16-bit backend (there are at least two
>> projects for doing that.)
>>
>> For now, I have:
>
> Can't you use the global CFLAGS and append your specific ones?
>
>> CFLAGS := $(LINUXINCLUDE) -g -Os -D_SETUP -D__KERNEL__ \
>
> -g ???
>
>> $(cflags-$(ARCH)) \
>> -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes \
>> -march=i386 -mregparm=3 \
>
> Why -march=i386 ?
To prevent gcc from using instructions (particularly cmovxx) that not
all processors will understand.
--
Brian Gerst
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists