[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070711090423.GA6758@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:04:23 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > c. Enable group scheduling bits only in -mm for now (2.6.23-mmX), using
> > Paul's container patches. I can send you a short patch that hooks up
> > cfs group scheduler with Paul's container infrastructure.
> >
> > If a. is not possible, I would prefer c.
> >
> > Let me know your thoughts ..
>
> I'm inclined to take the cautious route here - I don't think people
> will be dying for the CFS thingy (which I didn't even know about?) in
> .23, and it's rather a lot of infrastructure to add for a CPU
> scheduler configurator gadget (what does it do, anyway?)
>
> We have plenty of stuff for 2.6.23 already ;)
>
> Is this liveable with??
another option would be to trivially hook up CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
with cpusets, and to offer CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED in the Kconfig,
dependent on CPUSETS and defaulting to off. That would give it a chance
to be tested, benchmarked, etc.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists