| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:04:23 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org Subject: Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) * Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > c. Enable group scheduling bits only in -mm for now (2.6.23-mmX), using > > Paul's container patches. I can send you a short patch that hooks up > > cfs group scheduler with Paul's container infrastructure. > > > > If a. is not possible, I would prefer c. > > > > Let me know your thoughts .. > > I'm inclined to take the cautious route here - I don't think people > will be dying for the CFS thingy (which I didn't even know about?) in > .23, and it's rather a lot of infrastructure to add for a CPU > scheduler configurator gadget (what does it do, anyway?) > > We have plenty of stuff for 2.6.23 already ;) > > Is this liveable with?? another option would be to trivially hook up CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED with cpusets, and to offer CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED in the Kconfig, dependent on CPUSETS and defaulting to off. That would give it a chance to be tested, benchmarked, etc. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists