linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [ide] mmio ide support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070710150228.15008b53@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:02:28 +0400
From:	Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [ide] mmio ide support

On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 21:13:06 +0100
Alan Cox wrote:

> On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:48:52 +0400
> Vitaly Bordug <vitb@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > This adds support for MMIO IDE device like CompactFlash 
> > in TrueIDE mode.
> 
> Really we should be working towards libata support for all new
> devices. This looks like a candidate for the existing (or a little
> enhanced) pata_platform driver.
> 

Yes I am aware of it, yet, the code was created for IDE subsystem due to internal reasons,
and I thought to better make it available for others at least. We'll prolly pick it up to move
to libata/pata_platform but not instantly afaict now.

> > +config BLK_DEV_MMIOIDE
> > +	tristate "Memory Mapped IDE support"
> 
> Please pick a better description. This isn't a generic option for
> enabling MMIO based IDE as you make it sound.
> 
> 
> Also we have an accepted match name for ATA platform devices - and
> adding another one messes it up irrespective of whether you want
> libata or legacy IDE support. If you use the same matches then your
> platform code, and everyone elses platform code can work with both
> drivers, except for hotpluggability.
> 
> Other bugs
> 
> - Your remove code releases the resources before the hwif which means
> it races another user trying to claim the resource
> - Be careful with ide_unregister. It exists and you can call it but
> its actually not very safe and there are lots of unfixed races in the
> IDE layer if you do
> 

OK, makes sense.
> 
> The "should we have a legacy ide driver that matches the libata
> pata_platform" question I don't really care about. Its a waste of
> effort in many ways but if you've written the code the work is done
> so why not use it.
> 
> However it needs to be *compatible* so that platform devices can be
> claimed by either so the kernel build can pick legacy IDE v libata and
> not have to #ifdef all the platform code.
> 

Sounds good. I'll look forward to address the issues, thanks.

> Alan


-- 
Sincerely, Vitaly
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/