| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <E1I8a6Y-0008Sm-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:11:34 +0200 From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> To: rjw@...k.pl CC: miklos@...redi.hu, a1426z@...ab.com, jeremy@...p.org, jbms@....edu, pavel@....cz, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: Hibernation Redesign > Anyway, to implement the kexec approach we must separate the > hibernation from the suspend at the drivers level, which I'm still > going to do, but I need to take part in endless discussions Discussions are good. We understand the problem better. Now I still think we don't understand every aspect completely, so continuing the discussion makes sense. > regarding the freezer, how it is bad and how we should drop it, > because it breaks things (which NB is not true, because it doesn't). This thread started out from a bug, that seemed to be caused by the freezer (we still don't exactly know what it was caused by), and the discussion uncovered various problems _with_ the freezer, that up to now no other _proper_ solutions have been propsed than to remove the freezer. Yes, we can live with hacks, but we don't want to live with them forever. Even if they seem to be simpler than a big rewrite, the long term headaches are not worth it. Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists