[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707111005.53836.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:05:53 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 01:17:42 am Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:03:35PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > [PATCH] serial: do not add port that is not initialized
> >
> > if the port is not initialized with correct iobase, and membase, we don't
> > need to add that port.
> > for x86, when pnpacpi is enabled, we will not get extra ttyS1/ttyS2/ttyS3 in
> > /sys/devices/platform/serial8250/tty
> >
> > Sign-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>
>
> What if someone wants to run setserial on /dev/ttyS1 to set it's base
> address, irq and other parameters? People still do this.
I agree that people still use setserial that way, and we shouldn't
make this change because it would break things.
But I also agree with Yinghai that these extra phantom devices are
just weird. It would be a lot nicer if there were a way to say,
"please, Mr. Serial Driver, create me a new ttyS device with these
parameters."
But no, I'm not volunteering to do that.
Bjorn
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists