[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469512C1.6090406@tmr.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:26:25 -0400
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 19:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> i'm pleased to announce release -v19 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
>
> I've taken mainline git tree (freshly integrated CFS!) out for a
> multimedia spin. I tested watching movies and listenign to music in the
> presence of various sleep/burn loads, pure burn loads, and mixed loads.
> All was peachy here.. I saw no frame drops or sound skips or other
> artifacts under any load where the processor could possibly meet demand.
>
I would agree with preliminary testing, save that if you get a lot of
processes updating the screen at once, there seems to be a notable case
of processes getting no CPU for 100-300ms, followed by a lot of CPU.
I see this clearly with the "glitch1" test with four scrolling xterms
and glxgears, but also watching videos with little busy processes on the
screen. The only version where I never see this in test or with real use
is cfs-v13.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists