| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:31:29 +0200 From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com> To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Quite trivial patches listed as needing re-review? (was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) On 10/07/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: [snip] > submitchecklist-update-fix-spelling-error.patch ... > > Merge, subject to re-review. > ... > add-missing-files-and-dirs-to-00-index-in-documentation.patch > remove-the-last-few-umsdos-leftovers.patch ... > Merge, subject to re-review. [snip] Can't speak for all the other patches, but the 3 listed above are quite trivial and hardly touch any code at all. I'm wondering why they are not just pushed upstream, but instead listed as "subject to re-review" ? Am I supposed to do anything to get them merged? -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists