linux-kernel - Quite trivial patches listed as needing re-review? (was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a8748490707111031x4de0d2efp6ee8e3bb3b2f6f5a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:31:29 +0200
From:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Quite trivial patches listed as needing re-review? (was: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23)

On 10/07/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
[snip]
> submitchecklist-update-fix-spelling-error.patch
...
>
>  Merge, subject to re-review.
>
...
> add-missing-files-and-dirs-to-00-index-in-documentation.patch
> remove-the-last-few-umsdos-leftovers.patch
...
> Merge, subject to re-review.
[snip]

Can't speak for all the other patches, but the 3 listed above are
quite trivial and hardly touch any code at all. I'm wondering why they
are not just pushed upstream, but instead listed as "subject to
re-review" ?

Am I supposed to do anything to get them merged?

-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/