[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070711175026.GC4189@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:50:26 +0300
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <Yinghai.Lu@....COM>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86-64: introduce struct pci_sysdata to facilitate sharing of ->sysdata
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 09:41:59AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> >Andi, please consider applying for 2.6.23. Applies on top of the
> >Calgary update I just sent out ("Calgary: more updates for 2.6.23").
> >
> >This patch introduces struct pci_sysdata to x86 and x86-64, and
> >converts the existing two users (NUMA, Calgary) to use it.
> >
> >This lays the groundwork for having other users of sysdata, such as
> >the PCI domains work.
> >
> >The Calgary bits are tested, the NUMA bits just look ok.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
> >Signed-off-by: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
>
> how about acpi=off in x86_64 system?
Are you asking if it works? my main victim machines don't boot at all
with acpi=off regardless of this patch so I can't test it there. I'll
try to find a sacrifical Opteron machine to try it on.
> You maybe update this with
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/29/246
> Andrew already sent that to Andi for 2.6.23
It's in Andi's "need more review" list, so I guess it depends on
Andi's preference which (if any) of these patches will go in
first. Andi?
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists