[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070711110453.c4020526.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:04:53 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: lguest, Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:23:24 +0200
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> > lguest-export-symbols-for-lguest-as-a-module.patch
>
> __put_task_struct is one of those no way in hell should this be exported
> things because we don't want modules messing with task lifetimes.
>
> Fortunately I can't find anything actually using this in lguest, so
> it looks the issue has been solved in the meantime.
>
Ther are a couple of calls to put_task_struct() in there, and that needs
__put_task_struct() exported.
>
> I also have a rather bad feeling about exporting access_process_vm.
> This is the proverbial sledge hammer for access to user vm addresses
> and I'd rather keep it away from module programmers with "if all
> you have is a hammer ..." in mind.
hm, well, access_process_vm() is a convenience wrapper around
get_user_pages(), whcih is exported.
> In lguest this is used by send_dma which from my short reading of the
> code seems to be the central IPC mechanism. The double copy here
> doesn't look very efficient to me either. Maybe some VM folks could
> look into a better way to archive this that might be both more
> efficient and not require the export.
>
>
> > lguest-the-guest-code.patch
> > lguest-the-host-code.patch
> > lguest-the-host-code-lguest-vs-clockevents-fix-resume-logic.patch
> > lguest-the-asm-offsets.patch
> > lguest-the-makefile-and-kconfig.patch
> > lguest-the-console-driver.patch
> > lguest-the-net-driver.patch
> > lguest-the-block-driver.patch
> > lguest-the-documentation-example-launcher.patch
>
> Just started to reading this (again) so no useful comment here, but it
> would be nice if the code could follow CodingStyle and place the || and
> && at the end of the line in multiline conditionals instead of at the
> beginning of the new one.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists