linux-kernel - Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46953DB8.6080008@zytor.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:29:44 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 setup code rewrite in C - revised

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
> I'm sure you know what's changed since the last revision, but nobody
> everybody does :)  It would be nice to know what's different from the
> last posting.
> 

- Added -fno-toplevel-reorder/-fno-unit-at-a-time to the Makefile; this
  is necessary for .code16gcc to be safe on all current versions of gcc.
  Added comment to that effect to code16gcc.h.
- Moved strnlen, atou and isdigit out of printf.c.
- Corrected title of cpu.c and cpucheck.c.
- Fixed "paragraps" typo in pm.c.
- Removed bogus <linux/edd.h> in string.c.
- Removed #include <linux/mmzone.h> from asm-x86/e820.h; according to
  Andi it isn't needed even for non-_SETUP, and my compile testing seems
  to confirm that.

Full diff attached.

	-hpa



View attachment "diff" of type "text/plain" (5257 bytes)