linux-kernel - Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070711221825.GB25510@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:18:25 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:46:41PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Andi,
> 
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 23:16 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: 
> > > What contribution do we have from you instead? A week before the .23 
> > 
> > I told him my objections privately earlier. Basically i would
> > like to see an actually debuggable step-by-step change, not a rip everything 
> > out.
> 
> You promised privately to do a thorough review as well, which I'm still
> waiting for since months.

I did some reviewing, but never the big write up and feedback. That was my
fault, sorry.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/