linux-kernel - Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707111557150.20061@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:58:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23



On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Chris Wright wrote:
> 
> That's not quite right.  Leaving the code unchanged caused breakage
> already.  The PIT is damn stupid and can be sensitive to how quickly it's
> programmed.  So code that enable/disable didn't change, but frequency
> with which it is called did and broke some random boxes.

Sure. We cannot avoid *all* problems. Bugs happen. 

But at least we could try to make sure that there aren't totally 
unnecessary changes in that switch-over patch. Which there definitely 
were, as far as I can tell.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/