[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070711162112.5c876b95.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:21:12 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:39:19 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Randy,
>
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 14:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > I certainly haven't. I can barely keep up with reading about 1/2
> > of lkml emails. And in my non-scientific method, I think that we
> > are suffering from both (a) more patch submittals and (b) fewer
> > qualified reviewers (per kernel KLOC) than we had 3-5 years ago.
> >
> > I don't see how you can expect Andrew to review these or any other
> > specific patchset. Do you have some suggestions on how to clone
> > Andrew?
>
> Ingo was talking to Andi, the x86_64 maintainer, not to Andrew.
Yep, I see that when I re-read it. I apologize.
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists