[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46959516.30007@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:42:30 +1000
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>
Subject: Re: block_page_mkwrite? (Re: fault vs invalidate race (Re: -mm merge
plans for 2.6.23))
David Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:54:57AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>>Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>>>The fault-vs-invalidate race fix. I have belatedly learned that these
>>>need
>>>more work, so their state is uncertain.
>>
>>The more work may turn out being too much for you (although it is nothing
>>exactly tricky that would introduce subtle bugs, it is a fair amont of
>>churn).
>
>
> OK, so does that mean we can finally get the block_page_mkwrite
> patches merged?
>
> i.e.:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117426058311032&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117426070111136&w=2
>
> I've got up-to-date versions of them ready to go and they've been
> consistently tested thanks to the XFSQA test I wrote for the bug
> that it fixes. I've been holding them out-of-tree for months now
> because ->fault was supposed to supercede this interface.....
Yeah, as I've said, don't hold them back because of me. They are
relatively simple enough that I don't see why they couldn't be
merged in this window.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists