[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070711164531.aef1dcac.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:45:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...b.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] Add /sys/kernel/notes
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Roland McGrath <roland@...b.com> wrote:
> +/*
> + * Make /sys/kernel/notes give the raw contents of our kernel .notes section.
> + */
> +extern const char __start_notes __attribute__((weak));
> +extern const char __stop_notes __attribute__((weak));
> +#define notes_size (&__stop_notes - &__start_notes)
> +
> +static ssize_t notes_read(struct kobject *kobj,
> + char *buf, loff_t off, size_t count)
> +{
> + memcpy(buf, &__start_notes + off, count);
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static struct bin_attribute notes_attr = {
> + .attr = {
> + .name = "notes",
> + .mode = S_IRUGO,
> + },
> + .read = ¬es_read,
> +};
> +
> decl_subsys(kernel, NULL, NULL);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kernel_subsys);
>
> @@ -88,6 +110,12 @@ static int __init ksysfs_init(void)
> error = sysfs_create_group(&kernel_subsys.kobj,
> &kernel_attr_group);
>
> + if (!error && notes_size > 0) {
> + notes_attr.size = notes_size;
> + error = sysfs_create_bin_file(&kernel_subsys.kobj,
> + ¬es_attr);
> + }
I'm curios to know what happens if nobody defines __start_notes and
__end_notes. We'll use the extern-attribute-weak thing, but those two
locations won't even get instantiated in vmlinux, I think.
And the code relies upon the difference between two non-existent
attribute-weak locations being zero.
akpm:/home/akpm> cat t.c
#include <stdio.h>
extern const char __start_notes __attribute__((weak));
extern const char __stop_notes __attribute__((weak));
main()
{
int a = &__stop_notes - &__start_notes;
printf("%d\n", a);
}
akpm:/home/akpm> gcc -g t.c
akpm:/home/akpm> ./a.out
0
akpm:/home/akpm> nm a.out|grep notes
w __start_notes
w __stop_notes
So it all works OK on this toolchain. But is it _supposed_ to work? Are
we venturing into unexplored binutils territory here?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists