[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4695BF6C.9000501@qumranet.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:43:08 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Luca <kronos.it@...il.com>
CC: kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] KVM: Use the scheduler preemption hooks
to make kvm preemptible
Luca wrote:
> On 7/11/07, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote:
>> Current kvm disables preemption while the new virtualization
>> registers are
>> in use. This of course is not very good for latency sensitive
>> workloads (one
>> use of virtualization is to offload user interface and other latency
>> insensitive stuff to a container, so that it is easier to analyze the
>> remaining workload). This patch re-enables preemption for kvm;
>> preemption
>> is now only disabled when switching the registers in and out, and during
>> the switch to guest mode and back.
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/kvm/Kconfig b/drivers/kvm/Kconfig
>> index 33fa28a..92644b5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/kvm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/kvm/Kconfig
>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ if VIRTUALIZATION
>>
>> config KVM
>> tristate "Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) support"
>> - depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL
>> + depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL && PREEMPT_HOOKS
>> depends on X86_CMPXCHG64 || 64BIT
>
> select PREEMPT_HOOKS maybe?
>
Yes. And default PREEMPT_HOOKS to n in the first patch. I'll make both
these changes.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists