linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070712063753.GV31489@sgi.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:37:53 +1000
From:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc:	Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...?

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:08:36PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >One of the big problem spots was XFS, but that got some stack usage 
> >fixes recently, and the 4K stack option has been around for quite a 
> >while now, so people really should have gotten around to fixing any 
> >code that can't handle it.   Are there still any big problem areas 
> >remaining?
> >  
> 
> I get frequent crashes when I use 4k stacks with XFS+lvm, using recent 
> kernels.  When did XFS stack use reductions go in?

February. They were fixes for gcc4.x stack usage regressions (i.e. a ~25%
increase) over gcc 3.3.5. They were not new stack reduction patches....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/