linux-kernel - Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3aa654a40707120535g7d1b73uf5c73ef68a1cd98a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2007 05:35:24 -0700
From:	"Avuton Olrich" <avuton@...il.com>
To:	"Kacper Wysocki" <kacperw@...ine.no>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Matthew Hawkins" <darthmdh@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Con Kolivas" <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	"ck list" <ck@....kolivas.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	"Paul Jackson" <pj@....com>
Subject: Re: [ck] Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23

On 7/12/07, Kacper Wysocki <kacperw@...ine.no> wrote:
> performance, testing and impact. The big question is: why *don't* we
> merge it?

Stranger thing to me is that this is like Déjà Vu. Many have asked
this same question. When users were asked for their comment before
many end users and some developers have given rave reviews. I don't
remember anyone giving it the heavy thumbs-down, with exception of
when things needed fixing (over 6 months ago?). It continues to go
unmerged. Is there a clear answer on what needs to happen for it to
get merged?
-- 
avuton
--
 Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/