| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a9e22dff0707120558k17ca1f86rb0044096d60c4dc1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:58:34 +0300 From: "Ni@m" <niam.niam@...il.com> To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Fwd: NPTL >>BTW, please do _NOT_ top post! sorry >>No, a process also contains an address space. Of course .. I ment they are _almoust_ similar. >>No, that is creating a schedule unit (task) without an address space. Ok, I've already found that in kernel code ... and correctly understood. >>Surely you need some context switch when switching between runnable contexts. Hm. If the thread is running after it's sister or parent process - you do not have to switich the process context. Is this done in kernel?? Sorry if my thought are idiotic .. I'm a newby and trying to investigate the kernel. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists