[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070712140658.GA3881@ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:06:59 +0000
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
nigel@...el.suspend2.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation
Hi!
> >Maybe my usage of terminology has some problem. But,
> >the "device
> >hibernate" here means put device into quiescent state
> >and save the
> >device state, but do not put device into low power
> >state.
>
> is there really enough savings (in time or otherwise) to
> make it worth splitting this into two steps? for
Yep.
> but I suspect that the number of drivers where this is
> worth doing is relativly small, and it may be a better
> approach to start off with just putting everything into
> the low-power state until some drive shows up that makes
> it worth adding the intermediate state to the system
We have had this flamewar before, and linus decided 'snapshot' and
'suspend' are different operations - and he's right. Disk takes 10
seconds to suspend/resume (spindown).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists