linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.22-rc6 bad page error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:13:46 +0100 (BST)
From:	Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To:	Bill Irwin <wli@...omorphy.com>
cc:	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Bob Tracy <rct@...rkin.frus.com>,
	Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc6 bad page error

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:07:59PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> 
> > > +	return __pci_alloc_consistent(dev, size, dma, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > 
> > I was going to ask you why that needs to be GFP_ATOMIC on Alpha.
> > But find you're following the example of asm-generic and others.
> > So really should be asking Sparc how it gets away with GFP_KERNEL.
> 
> According to DMA-mapping.txt GFP_ATOMIC is mandatory for
> pci_alloc_consistent() since it can be called from interrupt context.
> So sparc code is probably incorrect...

Hi Bill, we've veered away from the original topic, and are wondering
how the sparc32 pci_alloc_consistent() gets away with using GFP_KERNEL,
when GFP_ATOMIC seems to be required?

Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/