linux-kernel - Re: kernel autoconfig option?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <11610.1184265341@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:35:41 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Mark Shelby <mshelby1@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel autoconfig option?

On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:18:55 EDT, Mark Shelby said:

> Am I just crazy, or wouldn't this idea mke a lot of sense? Wouldn't it
> pretty much make the kernel "idiot proof" when installing from source?

That's usually not the place where idiots screw up.  It's stuff like
loading an initrd that doesn't do LVM, and your / is on an LVM partition,
or going from a kernel that used the IDE drivers to one that uses libata,
and forgetting to fix /etc/fstab for the /dev/hd -> /dev/sd change, or ...

You get the idea.  At some point, you have to insist that the user's clue
must be  ----> THIS TALL in order to build their own kernel rather than going
with what the distro installed.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped