[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707121204200.25614@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:05:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Mark Lord wrote:
> david@...g.hm wrote:
>>
>> actually, I think that while you may be able to get away with only one
>> kernel, you are probably better off with two. on the hibernate kernel you
>> can choose many 'embedded' options that don't make sense for the normal
>> kernel (no high mem, no SMP support, no SELinux, no network routing, not
>> netfilter, use SLOB not SLAB/SLUB, etc). also keep in mind that each
>> module that you load wastes apartial page of memory.
>
> No highmem? No thanks.
>
> I really want hibernate to save stuff from above 1GB as well
> as the stuff below 1GB.
oops, good point. I was thinking that the hibernate kernel wouldn't need
that much ram for it's own operation and forgetting that it needed to
access everything the main system had.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists