[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070712003731.GA8126@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:37:31 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, James.Smart@...lex.Com,
pcihpd-discuss@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] [PATCH 26/34] PCI: add pci_try_set_mwi
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:01:49PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:31:40PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > As suggested by Andrew, add pci_try_set_mwi(), which does not require
> > return-value checking.
>
> Seems like a daft suggestion. What's wrong with just removing the
> __must_check from pci_set_mwi()? Did it find any bugs?
>
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
> > @@ -1578,10 +1578,7 @@ lpfc_pci_probe_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *pid)
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&phba->fc_nodes);
> >
> > pci_set_master(pdev);
> > - retval = pci_set_mwi(pdev);
> > - if (retval)
> > - dev_printk(KERN_WARNING, &pdev->dev,
> > - "Warning: pci_set_mwi returned %d\n", retval);
> > + pci_try_set_mwi(pdev);
>
> Why remove the warning? Presumably people want to know if pci_set_mwi
> failed.
Randy, this was your change, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists