[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070712235707.a08f0d42.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:57:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>, bill.irwin@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gurudas.pai@...cle.com
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages_node
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:49:38 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> first_node(node_online_map);
Incidentally, we have a helper for this operation:
#if MAX_NUMNODES > 1
...
#define first_online_node first_node(node_online_map)
...
#else
...
#define first_online_node 0
...
#endif
So I suppose we should use that - it should generate better code for
non-NUMA builds.
It's a pretty sadly implemented helper though. It should be
"first_online_node()", not "first_online_node".
I'm scratching my head over that min_t in __first_node(), too. I don't think
it's possible for find_first_bit(..., N) to return anything >N _anyway_. And if
it does, we want to know about it.
<looks at Paul>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists