[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707131130.51279.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:30:50 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Joseph Fannin <jfannin@...il.com>
Cc: david@...g.hm, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Hibernating To Swap Considered Harmful
On Friday, 13 July 2007 07:42, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 08:06:43PM -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > > Plus we need to figure out how to avoid corrupting filesystems and
> > > swap in use by the "old" kernel and its processes (hint: a separate
> > > "hibernation partition" is a no-go).
> >
> > I thought the existing hibernation wrote to the swap partition as it's
> > dedicated space?
> >
> > I didn't know that anyone was suggesting writing the hibernation image to
> > a filesystem that the kernel was activly accessing.
>
> I'm suggesting a dedicated, preallocated hibernation *file*, right
> now. There's no way around it, if hibernation is to be reliable --
> otherwise hibernation can fail if the system has used enough of its
> swap space, so that there isn't enough room to write the hibernate
> image.
>
> Even if it's desirable to allow hibernation to fail if the system is
> too deep into swap, it's a moot point.
If you're afraid of that, use a dedicated swap file.
Greetings,
Rafael
--
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists