[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1184330904.6059.223.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:48:24 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, joe.jin@...cle.com,
bill.irwin@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gurudas.pai@...cle.com, zwane@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages_node
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 01:54 -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > Something for the young ...
>
> ... ancient self smiles with relief, glad that Andrew is not looking
> this way ;).
>
> > We could do this: add a little bitops torture-test and run that
> > unconditionally, nice and early.
>
> Good idea. That would allow for wide spread coverage across all arch's
> that they obeyed the rules for the tighter API - find_first_bit returning
> exactly N on finding no bits set, before we took the risk of actually
> relying on the changed API, by removing those min_t() guards.
That, the lockdep tests, the RCU tests...
Looks like the kernel is building up it's own test suite :-) That's a
-good- thing, maybe we should formalize it a bit (separate the "test
suite" config options) ?
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists