[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070713114532.07f9fd53.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:45:32 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] slob: improvements
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 13:35:06 -0500
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:27:25AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > Index: linux-2.6/init/Kconfig
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/init/Kconfig
> > > +++ linux-2.6/init/Kconfig
> > > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ config SLUB
> > > way and has enhanced diagnostics.
> > >
> > > config SLOB
> > > - depends on EMBEDDED && !SPARSEMEM
> > > + depends on EMBEDDED && !SPARSEMEM && !ARCH_USES_SLAB_PAGE_STRUCT
> > > bool "SLOB (Simple Allocator)"
> > > help
> > > SLOB replaces the SLAB allocator with a drastically simpler
> >
> > Is this patch going in? I have a randconfig (2.6.22) with
> > CONFIG_SLOB=y
> > CONFIG_NUMA=y
> > CONFIG_SMP=y
> > The kernel build fails with these config symbols set like that.
> > It looks like SLOB needs that additional
> > && !ARCH_USES_SLAB_PAGE_STRUCT
> > (or && !SMP)
>
> I think Andrew intends to push it to 2.6.23, yes.
>
Yup.
I had to hunt for it though. Turns out I renamed the patch to
slob-rework-freelist-handling. Please don't give patches dopey titles like
"slob improvements".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists