linux-kernel - Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4696FFBE.3030806@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:59:50 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Kalpak Shah <kalpak@...sterfs.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, cmm@...ibm.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@...sterfs.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp



Kalpak Shah wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400
>> Mingming Cao <cmm@...ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches.
>> I don't know what the "old nanosecond patches" are.  A link to a suitable
>> changlog for those patches would do in a pinch.  Preferable would be to
>> write a proper changelog for this patch.
> 
> The incremental patch contains a proper changelog describing the patch.
> 


Instead of  putting incremental patches it would be nice if we can have replacement patches.
for the already existing patches with the comments addressed. For example if we have a 
review comment on the patch message ( commit log ) then adding an incremental patch doesn't help.


-aneesh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/