[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070712214048.703567db.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:40:48 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: x86 status was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 04:23:43 +0200 (CEST) Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > Sure, bugs happen, but code that everybody runs the same generally doesn't
> > break. So a CPU scheduler doesn't worry me all that much. CPU schedulers
> > are "easy".
>
> A little more advance warning wouldn't have hurt though.
> The new scheduler does _a_lot_ of heavy 64 bit calculations without any
> attempt to scale that down a little...
> One can blame me now for not having it brought up earlier, but discussions
> with Ingo are not something I'm looking forward to. :(
>
I brought that up a couple of weeks ago, got handwaved at and gave up.
It still isn't obvious to me that all that arith needs to be 64-bit
on 32-bit machines, or even on 64-bit. 4e9 is a big number.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists