linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:18:42 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
Cc:	bill.irwin@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add nid sanity on alloc_pages_node

On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:45:07 +0800 Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com> wrote:

> This patch add nid sanity check on alloc_pages_node().
> While two process change nr_hugepages at a system, alloc_fresh_huge_page()
> been called, at this function, nid defined as a static variable, but, there
> is not any protection of, if 2 process called at the same time, maybe pass a
> invalid nid to alloc_pages_node. 
> 
> We have hit it by following scripts:
> 
> #!/bin/bash
> while : ; do 
> 	echo 1000000000000 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages 
> 	echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages 
> 	echo 10000000000000000000 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages 
> 	echo 0 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages 
> done 
> 
> 
> Run the script at _two_ difference terminal, after a short time, a kernel panic
> info will print.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Jin <joe.jin@...cle.com>
> ---
> 
> --- linux-2.6.22/include/linux/gfp.h.orig	2007-07-12 15:06:23.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6.22/include/linux/gfp.h	2007-07-12 15:02:59.000000000 +0800
> @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@
>  	/* Unknown node is current node */
>  	if (nid < 0)
>  		nid = numa_node_id();
> +	
> +	if (unlikely(nid == MAX_NUMNODES))
> +		nid = first_node(node_online_map);
>  
>  	return __alloc_pages(gfp_mask, order,
>  		NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelists + gfp_zone(gfp_mask));

alloc_pages_node() is pretty much the last place where we want to fix this:
it adds more cycles and more code to many important codepaths in the
kernel.

It'd be much better to fix the race within alloc_fresh_huge_page().  That
function is pretty pathetic.

Something like this?

--- a/mm/hugetlb.c~a
+++ a/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -105,13 +105,20 @@ static void free_huge_page(struct page *
 
 static int alloc_fresh_huge_page(void)
 {
-	static int nid = 0;
+	static int prev_nid;
+	static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nid_lock);
 	struct page *page;
-	page = alloc_pages_node(nid, htlb_alloc_mask|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOWARN,
-					HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER);
-	nid = next_node(nid, node_online_map);
+	int nid;
+
+	spin_lock(&nid_lock);
+	nid = next_node(prev_nid, node_online_map);
 	if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
 		nid = first_node(node_online_map);
+	prev_nid = nid;
+	spin_unlock(&nid_lock);
+
+	page = alloc_pages_node(nid, htlb_alloc_mask|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOWARN,
+					HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER);
 	if (page) {
 		set_compound_page_dtor(page, free_huge_page);
 		spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
_

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/