[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070712222452.8f14a7db.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:24:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: sysfs: release mutex when kmalloc() failed in
sysfs_open_file().
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 13:56:46 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
> index b502c71..1f64ce5 100644
> --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ static int sysfs_open_file(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> if (!(set = inode->i_private)) {
> if (!(set = inode->i_private = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sysfs_buffer_collection), GFP_KERNEL))) {
> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> error = -ENOMEM;
> goto Done;
> } else {
All this code is totally different in Greg's development tree, so this
fix really is only applicable to 2.6.22.x.
I suppose we could apply this to -stable, but given GFP_KERNEL's present behaviour
for small allocations it's pretty theoretical.
Unless you've enabled fault-injection in the page allocator, or if you get
oom-killed in that allocation. In which case your kernel is dead.
So hm, perhaps you'd best send this to stable@...nel.org.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists