[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070713062039.GA29055@nineveh.local>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:20:39 -0400
From: jfannin@...il.com (Joseph Fannin)
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Joseph Fannin <jfannin@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Hibernating To Swap Considered Harmful
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:57:04PM -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Joseph Fannin wrote:
>
> the only justification I have heard for why the hibernate image must be
> written to the swap partition is backwards compatibility (i.e., we've
> always done it that way)
>
> if you are going to reserve disk space for hibernation, what is so bad
> about useing a normal partition?
>
You have to either repartition when you upgrade your memory, or
waste a bunch of disk space with a partition as large as you think
your RAM might ever expand to.
Swap/hibernate files can be created, deleted, and resized without
partitioning.
Also: not all platforms support a large number of partitions.
It's not academic -- Intel Macintoshes are limited to four, with two
taken by Mac OS. Add Windows and a Linux /, and you're out --
there's no room for a swap file.
--
Joseph Fannin
jfannin@...il.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists