[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707140128210.25614@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 01:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, nigel@...el.suspend2.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation
by the way, a data point on kernel sizes
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 864648 Jul 14 00:53 vmlinuz.2.6.22.1.hibernate
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 659496 Jul 14 01:17 vmlinuz.2.6.22.1.hibernate.stripped
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3948168 Jul 14 01:10 vmlinuz.2.6.22.1.running
the running one matches the config I'm running on my home server, the
hibernate is a pretty stripped down version, and the stripped is close to
a minimum (including turning off printk and BUG()). All three are with all
drivers built-in, no module support.
this is on a amd64 64 bit system
configs are available if anyone cares, the point is how much smaller a
kernel could be if it doesn't need all the stuff that you put in your main
kernel. In my case this includes not enabling the 3-ware card that holds
my 12-disk raid array, instead the hibernate image would be stored on one
of the scsi drives attached to the adaptec 78xx card.
I expect that on a normal desktop/laptop with more features (like sound)
the savings could be even more significant
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists