[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <469A3EB9.8000304@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:05:21 +0530
From: jimmy bahuleyan <knight.camelot@...il.com>
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, david@...g.hm
Subject: Re: Hibernation considerations
Al Boldi wrote:
>
> This should be the responsibility of the kexec'd hibernating kernel. Note
> though in (6), the normal kernel takes care of preparing devices, then the
> hibernating kernel dumps the image and either calls S4 or S3. On resume
> from S3 it can immediately switch over to the normal kernel, and from S4 the
> known bootup would occur.
>
>> (8) Hibernation and restore should not be too slow
>>
>> In my opinion, if more than one minute is needed to hibernate the
>> system with the help of certain hibernation framework, then this framework
>> is not very useful in practice. It might be useful to perform some
>> special tasks (eg. moving a server to another place without taking it
>> down), but it is not very useful, for example, to notebook users.
>
> The latest hibernating kexec patches boot a kexec'd modular kernel with
> initramfs into crashkernel=16M@16M in less than one second. Switch-back is
> almost instant. Add to this the time required to either store or restore
> the image, and it may be obvious that this approach isn't slower, but maybe
> even faster than the current swsusp.
>
What about (9)? Would it be that a user choosing to build a kernel with
hibernate support gets a additional modular kernel built (which he
should then use for resumption) or he should configure & build the
modular kernel independent of main kernel?
Or will the Linux boot procedure change so that it always goes thru a
modular part followed by kexec (just to be uniform)?
Although the kexec approach seems interesting, the final user-scenario
seems a bit complex (or confusing).
-jb
--
Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists