[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070715190147.GG4034@traven>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 21:01:47 +0200
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com>
To: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: PATCH [2/5] fs/eventpoll.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
fs/eventpoll.c: use list_for_each_entry() instead of list_for_each()
in ep_poll_safewake()
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com>
--
diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index 0b73cd4..fada1f9 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -325,15 +325,14 @@ static void ep_poll_safewake(struct poll_safewake *psw, wait_queue_head_t *wq)
int wake_nests = 0;
unsigned long flags;
struct task_struct *this_task = current;
- struct list_head *lsthead = &psw->wake_task_list, *lnk;
+ struct list_head *lsthead = &psw->wake_task_list;
struct wake_task_node *tncur;
struct wake_task_node tnode;
spin_lock_irqsave(&psw->lock, flags);
/* Try to see if the current task is already inside this wakeup call */
- list_for_each(lnk, lsthead) {
- tncur = list_entry(lnk, struct wake_task_node, llink);
+ list_for_each_entry(tncur, lsthead, llink) {
if (tncur->wq == wq ||
(tncur->task == this_task && ++wake_nests > EP_MAX_POLLWAKE_NESTS)) {
--
Matthias Kaehlcke
Linux Application Developer
Barcelona
Usually when people are sad, they don't do anything. They just cry over
their condition. But when they get angry, they bring about a change
(Malcolm X)
.''`.
using free software / Debian GNU/Linux | http://debian.org : :' :
`. `'`
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 47D8E5D4 `-
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists