[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707160938.16037.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:38:13 +1000
From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: david@...g.hm, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
Subject: Re: Hibernation considerations
Hi.
On Monday 16 July 2007 09:15:47 Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 david@...g.hm wrote:
>
> > >> for a pure hibernate mode, you will be powering off the box after
saving
> > >> the suspend image. why are there any special ACPI modes involved?
> > >
> > > Because, for example, on my machine the status of power supply (present
> > > vs not present) is not updated correctly after the restore if ACPI
callbacks
> > > aren't used during the hibernation. That's just experience and it's in
line
> > > with the ACPI spec.
> >
> > so if a machine is actually powered off the /dev/suspend process won't
> > work?
> >
> > remember that the system may run a different OS between the hibernate and
> > the resume, makeing any assumptions about what state the hardware is in
> > when you start the resume is a problem.
>
> As I understand it, running a different OS between the hibernate and
> the resume would violate the ACPI spec.
Well then, I know one or two people who would argue that the ACPI spec is
faulty. :\
Regards,
Nigel
--
Nigel Cunningham
Christian Reformed Church of Cobden
103 Curdie Street, Cobden 3266, Victoria, Australia
Ph. +61 3 5595 1185 / +61 417 100 574
Communal Worship: 11 am Sunday.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists