[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707151645561.20061@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:49:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
cc: V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p Patches for 2.6.23 merge window
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
>
> The bulk of the changes were in the reorganization patch which mostly
> moved files and interfaces around in preparation for work on an
> in-kernel 9p server.
Please use "git diff -C --stat --summary" to generate the diffstat
summary.
In particular, because you didn't use -C (or -M), git have you an
old-style diffstat without renames, so the diffstat doesn't show that a
lot of it was moving code around.
(That said, you seem to have changed names a lot too, so it's not pure
code movement).
> 49 files changed, 5400 insertions(+), 5092 deletions(-)
With rename detection enabled, I get
36 files changed, 3444 insertions(+), 3130 deletions(-)
due to finding some (partially dubious) renames:
rename fs/9p/mux.h => include/net/9p/conn.h (53%)
rename {fs => include/net}/9p/transport.h (59%)
rename {fs => net}/9p/conv.c (55%)
rename {fs => net}/9p/fcprint.c (64%)
rename {fs => net}/9p/mux.c (55%)
even though is misses a lot of others (due to all the "v9fs" -> "p9"
changes in the source code too - was that really worth it?).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists