linux-kernel - Re: performance -cfs19 vs. -ck1 for 2.6.22

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070716085545.GA5964@elte.hu>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:55:45 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Ni@m" <niam.niam@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: performance -cfs19 vs. -ck1 for 2.6.22


* Ni@m <niam.niam@...il.com> wrote:

> Hi, Ingo!
> 
> >>Could you run the
> >>following script:
> >> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
> I'll do that! But a little bit later - I have tested that on my home 
> computer.
> 
> >>hm, is there no other workload on the system?
> Workload: firefox, transmission(torrent client), gnome terminal, music 
> player.
> 
> Now I think it could be not a scheduler issue but network subsystem 
> ... but I've got such situation on previous kernels and w/o torrent 
> client running.
>
> The problem is not in switching tabs in firefox but in 
> _opening_new_url_. I'm not good in Con's patches but are they touching 
> network subsystem?

Con's patches are not really touching the network subsystem, but we want 
to analyze this and figure out where the difference in behavior comes 
from, be that scheduling, networking or something else.

to help us figure out the nature of the delay, could you do another 
thing as well:

  strace -ttt -TTT -f -o firefox.trace.txt -p `pidof firefox-bin`

this will produce firefox.trace.txt - compress that via bzip -9. (and 
send that file privately - it might include private information embedded 
in URLs, etc.) Please do such a trace both under CFS and under -ck, 
under similar circumstances.

To isolate it down to the CPU scheduler changes you can create a pure 
2.6.22+SD kernel by applying this patch to a vanilla v2.6.22 tree:

  http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/2.6.22/2.6.22-ck1/patches/sched-staircase-deadline-cpu-scheduler.patch

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/