[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1IAMWA-0004fM-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:05:22 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: jeremy@...p.org
CC: jengelh@...putergmbh.de, viro@....linux.org.uk, nmiell@...cast.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: *at syscalls for xattrs?
> > fd1 = open("dir1", O_DIRECTORY):
> > fd2 = open("dir2", O_DIRECTORY);
> > system("mount -t tmpfs none dir1");
> > system("mount -t tmpfs none dir2");
> > openat(fd1, "file1", O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
> > openat(fd2, "file2", O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
> > If you have a better way to accomplish this, let me know. :)
> >
>
> This should work:
>
> fchdir(fd1);
> open("file1", O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
> fchdir(fd2);
> open("file2", O_RDWR | O_CREAT);
If you only have a single thread, yes.
The *at() thing basically gives you the advantages of a CWD without
the disadvantages.
For example it could be useful to implement the functionality of
find(1) as a library interface.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists