[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200707160710.09854.edt@aei.ca>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:10:08 +0000
From: Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
On Monday 16 July 2007 05:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca> wrote:
>
> > I run a java application at nice 15. Its been a background
> > application here for as long as SD and CFS have been around. If I
> > have a compile running at nice 0, with v19 java gets so little cpu
> > that the the wrapper that runs to monitor it is timing out waiting for
> > it to start. This is new in v19 - something in v19 is not meshing
> > well with my mix of applications...
>
> how much longer did the startup of the java app get relative to say v18?
>
> to debug this, could you check whether this problem goes away if you use
> nice 10 (or nice 5) instead of nice 15?
Ingo,
It may take a day to two before I get to test this. I have had to revert to 2.6.21 -
it seems that 22 triggers a stall here (21 also can trigger this but its harder)...
Thanks
Ed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists