[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070716121246.GA17880@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 14:12:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: James Bruce <bruce@...rew.cmu.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
* Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > As soon as you add another loop the difference changes again,
> > > while it's always correct to say it gets 25% more cpu time [...]
> >
> > yep, and i'll add the relative effect to the comment too.
>
> Why did you cut off the rest of the sentence?
(no need to become hostile, i answered to that portion of your sentence
separately, which was logically detached from the other portion of your
sentence. I marked the cut with the '[...]' sign. )
> To illustrate the problem a little different: a task with a nice level
> -20 got around 700% more cpu time (or 8 times more), now it gets 8500%
> more cpu time (or 86.7 times more). You don't think that change to the
> nice levels is a little drastic?
This was discussed on lkml in detail, see the CFS threads. It has been a
common request for nice levels to be more logical (i.e. to make them
universal and to detach them from HZ) and for them to be more effective
as well.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists