linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/33] SG table chaining support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18075.31515.974905.507754@stoffel.org>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:05:15 -0400
From:	"John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/33] SG table chaining support

Jens> A repost of this patchset, which adds support forchaining of sg
Jens> tables.  This enables much larger IO commands, since we don't
Jens> have to allocate large consecutive pieces of memory to represent
Jens> the sgtable of a huge command. Right now Linux is limited to
Jens> somewhere between 128 and 256 segments, depending on the
Jens> architecture. This translates into at most 512k-1mb request
Jens> sizes. With this patchset, I've successfully pushed 10MiB
Jens> commands through the IO stack.

Will this help out tape drive performance at all?  I looked through
the patches quickly, esp the AIC7xxx stuff since that's what I use,
but nothing jumped out at me...

John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/