linux-kernel - Re: Hibernation considerations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0707161013440.3410-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:15:30 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
cc:	david@...g.hm, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
	Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
Subject: Re: Hibernation considerations

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:

> > As I understand it, running a different OS between the hibernate and 
> > the resume would violate the ACPI spec.
> 
> Well then, I know one or two people who would argue that the ACPI spec is 
> faulty. :\

It's hard to argue against that.  In fact there are people who would 
argue that the ACPI spec is incomplete and inconsistent period, 
regardless of any questions about what happens between hibernate and 
resume.  :-)

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/