linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707161615400.1817@scrub.home>
Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] msleep() with hrtimers

Hi,

On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> because when i assumed the obvious, you called it an 
> insult so please dont leave any room for assumptions and remove any 
> ambiguity - especially as our communication seems to be marred by what 
> appears to be frequent misunderstandings ;-)

What the hell is this supposed to be? How am I not to take this:

"i did not want to embarrass you (and distract the discussion) with
answering a pretty stupid, irrelevant question"

as an insult? How does it reflect on someone if he asks "stupid, 
irrelevant questions"? If it had been a misunderstanding, you could have 
ask appropriately instead of assuming I'm an idiot.
BTW Adding smileys to it doesn't make it any funnier, since it I don't 
believe in the "misunderstandings" theory anymore. :-(

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/