[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707151654420.25614@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
cc: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard <jbms@....edu>,
Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@....com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Hibernation considerations
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Al Boldi wrote:
>
>> Alan Stern wrote:
>>> On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Al Boldi wrote:
>
>>>> This should be the responsibility of the kexec'd hibernating kernel.
>>>> Note though in (6), the normal kernel takes care of preparing devices,
>>>> then the hibernating kernel dumps the image and either calls S4 or S3.
>>>> On resume from S3 it can immediately switch over to the normal kernel,
>>>> and from S4 the known bootup would occur.
>>>
>>> Is it really that simple? Somehow I doubt it. In order for some
>>> devices to remain available for the kexec'd kernel to use, they cannot
>>> be suspended at the ACPI level. So the kexec'd kernel will have to
>>> handle the ACPI requirements for those devices. Likewise, it would
>>> have to handle the ACPI interactions which need to be done after all
>>> devices are prepared for the transition to S3 or S4.
>>
>> Ok, after applying the latest kexec patches, I was able to use the kexec'd
>> kernel to suspend to ram and resume to the normal kernel, while working
>> under a full-blown X session. It went without a hitch. All that is needed
>> now are the dump/restore hibernation-image routines.
>
> That's exactly my point. While doing suspend-to-RAM from a kexec'd
> kernel may be simple, saving the hibernation image will add
> complications.
suspend-to-RAM should not involve kexec, the only reason for doing the
kexec to to get a seperate userspace to use for suspend-to-disk operations
instead of trying to partially freeze the sustem and keep useing it.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists