linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mmc/core/: make 4 functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Jul 2007 04:33:46 +0200
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] drivers/mmc/core/: make 4 functions static

On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 06:52:34PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 01:56:02 +0200
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
> 
> > This patch makes the following needlessly global functions static:
> > - sd_ops.c: mmc_wait_for_app_cmd()
> > - core.c: mmc_start_request()
> 
> I am a bit torn about these two. Even though we don't cater to
> out-of-tree stuff, having these as exported symbols shows that they are
> part of the API. Removing them might risk people going about doing
> something silly because they don't know the functionality exists, and
> we might not spot it at patch review time.

If mmc_start_request() is considered part of an API people should use, 
why isn't there a prototype in a header file?

> Rgds

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/