[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707162000400.1817@scrub.home>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:12:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, James Bruce <bruce@...rew.cmu.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@...e.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> How about trying a much less aggressive nice-level (and preferably linear,
> not exponential)?
I think the exponential increase isn't the problem. The old code did
approximate something like this rather crudely with the result that there
was a big gap between level 0 and -1.
Something like this:
echo 'for (i=-20;i<=20;i++) print i, " : ", 1024*e(l(2)*(-i/20*3)), "\n";' | bc -l
would produce a range similiar to the old code. Replacing the factor 3
with 4 would be IMO a more reasonable increase and had the advantage for
the user that it's easier to understand that every 5 levels the time a
process gets is doubled.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists