[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070716125223.249a6914.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:52:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 6/7] Add common orderly_poweroff()
On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:57:14 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Various pieces of code around the kernel want to be able to trigger an
> orderly poweroff. This pulls them together into a single
> implementation.
>
> By default the poweroff command is /sbin/poweroff, but it can be set
> via sysctl: kernel/poweroff_cmd. This is split at whitespace, so it
> can include command-line arguments.
>
> This patch replaces four other instances of invoking either "poweroff"
> or "shutdown -h now": one sparc64, two sbus drivers, and acpi thermal
> management.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>
> Acked-by: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>
> ---
> arch/sparc64/kernel/power.c | 40 +-------------------------
> drivers/acpi/thermal.c | 24 +---------------
> drivers/sbus/char/bbc_envctrl.c | 5 +--
> drivers/sbus/char/envctrl.c | 7 +---
> include/linux/reboot.h | 5 +++
> include/linux/sysctl.h | 1
> kernel/sys.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> kernel/sysctl.c | 10 ++++++
I'm not sure how this ended up in the x86 tree
(ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/add-common-orderly_poweroff),
but recent changes in arch/sparc64/kernel/power.c have broken it.
Dave, those changes hit mainline without ever having appeared in the
sparc-2.6.git tree, afaict. If they _had_ appeared there I'd have been
able to tell you that there wasn't any point in changing code which we're
planning on deleting. Otoh,
[SPARC64]: Export powerd facilities for external entities.
Besides the existing usage for power-button interrupts, we'll
want to make use of this code for domain-services where the
LDOM manager can send reboot requests to the guest node.
make me think that this code isn't deleteable any more.
Ho hum, I will delete the sparc64 hunk and shall hope for the best. Mainly
to avoid downstream rejects - I suspect this patch needs revisting now.
Andi, your tree is looking pretty stale - I hope it will be updated soon?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists