| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 23:05:40 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il> To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@....mellanox.co.il>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, general@...ts.openfabrics.org Subject: Re: Further 2.6.23 merge plans... > Quoting Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>: > Subject: Re: Further 2.6.23 merge plans... > > > > I haven't done any work on it or seen anything from anyone else, so I > > > expect this will have to wait for 2.6.24. > > > I'm surprised to hear this. How about this: > > http://lists.openfabrics.org/pipermail/general/2007-May/035757.html > > Sure, I remember that. But I haven't seen anything to suggest that > anyone has given any further thought to the issues that were raised in > that thread. Well, the only issue I recall is about the # of EQs we want to allocate. Was there something else? Maybe code can be merged as-is (2 EQs) and the number be tuned later as applications start using vectors? -- MST - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists